La Gestión de las Contrataciones Públicas y Sostenibilidad Institucional: Análisis del Poder Interpersonal Desde un Enfoque Socio Técnico - Public Procurement Management and Institutional Sustainability: Analysis of Interpersonal Power from a Socio-Technical Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58493/ecca.2023.1.2.06Keywords:
Contratación Pública, Modelo Conceptual, Poder Interpersonal, Sostenibilidad Institucional, Public Procurement, Conceptual Model, Interpersonal Power, Institutional SustainabilityAbstract
Las contrataciones públicas (CP) representan más de la mitad del presupuesto de gobiernos, estudios previos demuestran que las CP se utilizan para resolver problemas socios ambientales y apoyar el desarrollo económico, sin embargo, se presenta ineficiencia y corrupción en su gestión. Este estudio propone un modelo conceptual para analizar la influencia del poder interpersonal en la gestión de las contrataciones públicas y la sostenibilidad institucional con un enfoque socio técnico. La propuesta también contempla la validación del modelo teórico a través de un estudio mixto y para el análisis de los datos se sugiere utilizar el modelo de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM). El propósito de esta investigación es aportar con fundamentos teóricos a la gestión y regulación de las CP, así como recomendar nuevas rutas para futuras investigaciones que permitan profundizar o ampliar el estudio.
Abstract
Public procurement (PP) accounts for more than half of government budgets. Previous studies have shown that PP is used to address socio-environmental problems and support economic development. However, inefficiency and corruption in PP management are prevalent. This study proposes a conceptual model to analyze the influence of interpersonal power on PP management and institutional sustainability, with a socio-technical approach. The proposal also includes the validation of the theoretical model through a mixed-methods study, and the suggested data analysis method is structural equation modeling (SEM). The purpose of this research is to provide theoretical foundations for PP management and regulation, as well as to recommend new avenues for future research that can deepen or expand the study
References
Adjei-Bamfo, P., Maloreh-Nyamekye, T., & Ahenkan, A. (2019). The role of e-government in sustainable
public procurement in developing countries: A systematic literature review. Resources, Conservation and
Recycling, 142(November 2018), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.001
Al-Yahya, K. O. (2009). Power-influence in decision making, competence utilization, and organizational
culture in public organizations: The Arab world in comparative perspective. Journal of Public
Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun005
Anthony, F. (2014). Theory in public procurement research. Journal of Public Procurement, 14(2), 139–
https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-14-02-2014-B001
Baldus, B. J., & Hatton, L. (2019). U.S. chief procurement officers’ perspectives on public procurement.
Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, May, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.05.003
Barnes, B. K. (2015). Excercising influence (Third Edit). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective, Part II:
The Application of Socio-Technical Theory. MIS Quarterly, 1(4), 11. https://doi.org/10.2307/249019
Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011). Sustainable procurement in the public sector: An international
comparative study. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 31(4), 452–476.
https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111119551
Brinker, J., & Haasis, H.-D. (2022). Power in the Context of SCM and Supply Chain Digitalization: An
Overview from a Literature Review. Logistics, 6(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6020025
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice.
Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306983
Cox, A., Ireland, P., Lonsdale, C., Sanderson, J., & Watson, G. (2003). Supply Chains, Markets and Power:
Managing Buyer and Supplier Power Regimes. In Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203299272
Dahl, R. (1957). The Concept of Power. Behavioural Science, 2, 201–215.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830020303
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2014). Power in Management and Organization Science. Academy of
Management Annals, 8(1), 237–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.875671
Flynn, A., & Davis, P. (2014). Theory in public procurement research. Journal of Public Procurement, 14(2),
–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-14-02-2014-B001
French, R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In U. M. P. Of (Ed.), Cartwright, D. (Ed.),
Studies in Social Power (D. (Ed.)). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412994088.n37
Glaser, S. R., Zamanou, S., & Hacker, K. (1987). Measuring and interpreting organizational culture.
Management Communication Quarterly, 1(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318987001002003
Grandia, J., & Meehan, J. (2017). Public procurement as a policy tool: using procurement to reach desired
outcomes in society. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(4), 302–309.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2017-0066
Griffith, T. L., & Dougherty, D. J. (2001). Beyond socio-technical systems: Introduction to the special issue.
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management - JET-M, 18(3–4), 207–218.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(01)00034-0
Grossi, G., & Pianezzi, D. (2018). The new public corruption: Old questions for new challenges. Accounting
Forum, 42(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.05.002
Harland, C., Telgen, J., Callender, G., Grimm, R., & Patrucco, A. (2019). Implementing Government Policy in
Supply Chains: An International Coproduction Study of Public Procurement. Journal of Supply Chain
Management, 55(2), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12197
Haugaard, M. (2012). Rethinking the four dimensions of power: Domination and empowerment. Journal of
Political Power, 5(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810
Hester, A. J. (2014). Socio-technical systems theory as a diagnostic tool for examining underutilization of
wiki technology. Learning Organization, 21(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-10-2012-0065
Hofstede, G. (1998). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations
across nations. In Management Science (Vol. 17, Issue 2, p. B-124-B-126). Sage Publications.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.2.b124
Hommen, L., & Rolfstam, M. (2009). Public procurement and innovation: towards a taxonomy. Journal of
Public Procurement, 8(1), 17–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-08-03-2008-B001
Hu, T. L., & Sheu, J. B. (2005). Relationships of channel power, noncoercive influence strategies, climate,
and solidarity: A real case study of the Taiwanese PDA industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(5),
–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.10.005
Koala, K., & Steinfeld, J. (2018). Theory building in public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement,
(4), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-11-2018-017
Lawless, S., Cohen, P., McDougall, C., Orirana, G., Siota, F., & Doyle, K. (2019). Gender norms and relations:
implications for agency in coastal livelihoods. Maritime Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-
-0
Lines, R. (2004). Influence of participation in strategic change: resistance, organizational commitment and
change goal achievement. Journal of Change Management, 4(3), 193–215.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1469701042000221696
Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., & Hua, Z. (2015). Influence of power and trust on the intention to adopt
electronic supply chain management in China. International Journal of Production Research, 53(1), 70–87.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.922711
Lukes, E. (2005). Power, A Radical View. In Contemporary Political Theory (Issue Mm).
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300291
Maloni, M., & Benton, W. C. C. (1999). Power Influences in the Supply Chain. Journal of Business Logistics,
(l), 49–73. https://search-proquest-com.ezproxybib.pucp.edu.pe/docview/212660941?
accountid=28391
McCue, C. P., Prier, E., & Swanson, D. (2015). Five dilemmas in public procurement. Journal of Public
Procurement, 15(2), 177–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/jopp-15-02-2015-b003
Meehan, J., Ludbrook, M. N., & Mason, C. J. (2016). Collaborative public procurement: Institutional
explanations of legitimised resistance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(3), 160–170.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2016.03.002
Milosavljević, M., Dobrota, M., & Milanović, N. (2019). A New Approach to the Evaluation of Public
Procurement Efficiency among European Countries. European Review, 27(02), 246–259.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1062798718000777
Morón, J. C. (2018). Las competencias normativas de las autoridades administrativas peruanas en
materia. Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, 119–157.
Obwegeser, N., & Müller, S. D. (2018). Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and
applications. Technovation, 74–75(January), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.015
OECD. (2018). Panorama de las Administraciones Públicas 2017. In Panorama de las Administraciones
Públicas 2017. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304543-es
OECD. (2021). Government at a Glance 2021. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en
OECD. (2023). Sustainability Policies and Practices for Corporate Governance in Latin America, Corporate
Governance, OECD. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/76df2285-en
Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization Linked references are
available on JSTOR for this article: Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. The Academy of
Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.
Pasmore, W., Winby, S., Mohrman, S. A., & Vanasse, R. (2019). Reflections: Sociotechnical Systems Design
and Organization Change. Journal of Change Management, 19(2), 67–85.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2018.1553761
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence
approach. In NY: Harper and Row Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392573
Reimann, F., & Ketchen Jr., D. J. (2017). Power in Supply Chain Management. 53(April), 3–9.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12140
Sahay, S., Aanestad, M., & Monteiro, E. (2009). Configurable politics and asymmetric integration: Health einfrastructures in India. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(5), 399–414.
https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00198
Salas, E., & Glickman, A. S. (1990). Comportamiento organizacional, teoría de sistemas socio-técnicos y
calidad de vida laboral la experiencia peruana. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 22(1), 69–82.
Shou, Y., Feng, Y., Zheng, J., Wang, G., & Yeboah, N. E. (2013). Power source and its effect on customersupplier relationships: An empirical study in Yangtze River Delta. International Journal of Production
Economics, 146(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.03.003
Siawsh, N., Peszynski, K., Young, L., & Vo-Tran, H. (2019). Exploring the role of power on procurement and
supply chain management systems in a humanitarian organisation: a socio-technical systems view.
International Journal of Production Research, 0(0), 1–25.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1634293
Simon, B. H. A. (1952). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. 99–118.
Stefano, A., Luzzini, D., & Ronchi, S. (2017). Research perspectives on public procurement: Content
analysis of 14 years of publications in the journal of public procurement. 17(2), 229–269.
Sturm, R. E., & Antonakis, J. (2015). Interpersonal Power: A Review, Critique, and Research Agenda. Journal
of Management, 41(1), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314555769
Torvatn, T., & de Boer, L. (2017). Public procurement reform in the EU: start of a new era? IMP Journal,
(3), 431–451. https://doi.org/10.1108/imp-09-2015-0056
Trammell, E., Abutabenjeh, S., & Dimand, A.-M. (2020). A Review of Public Administration Research: Where
Does Public Procurement Fit In? International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 655–667.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1644654
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. (1951). Some Social and Psychological Consequences of the Longwall Method of
Coal-Getting. Human Relations, 4(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863870092005
Uyarra, E., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Flanagan, K., & Magro, E. (2020). Public procurement, innovation
and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation. Research Policy, 49(1), 103844.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103844
Wan, R. (2014). Public Procurement of Innovation Policy: Competition Regulation, Market Structure and
Dominant Design (Vol. 14, Issue 4).
Wang, J. C., Wang, Y. Y., & Lai, F. (2019). Impact of power structure on supply chain performance and
consumer surplus. International Transactions in Operational Research, 26(5), 1752–1785.
https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12466
Weber, Y., & Pliskin, N. (1996). The effects of information systems integration and organizational culture
on a firm’s effectiveness. Information and Management, 30(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-
(95)00046-1
Zhao, X., Flynn, B. B., & Roth, A. V. (2007). Decision sciences research in China: Current status,
opportunities, and propositions for research in supply chain management, logistics, and quality
management. Decision Sciences, 38(1), 39–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00148.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Norvil Coronel Olano, Mario Enrique Vargas Sáenz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- Adaptar — remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material
- La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada , brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios . Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
- NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales .
- CompartirIgual — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, debe distribuir su contribución bajo la la misma licencia del original.
- No hay restricciones adicionales — No puede aplicar términos legales ni medidas tecnológicas que restrinjan legalmente a otras a hacer cualquier uso permitido por la licencia.
